New page - Abhijeet Gupta & Associates

Call us now:

+91 9267 919 004

+91 9267 919 004

abhijeetgupta_associates

"On Constitution Day, let us honor the spirit of j

"On Constitution Day, let us honor the spirit of justice, equality, and democracy that guides our nation forward."

Case Title: Anupama Singh vs. Prakash Chandra Gupt

Case Title: Anupama Singh vs. Prakash Chandra Gupta

How It Benefits Us: This case under Section 138 of the NI Act highlights handling dishonored cheques alongside allegations of unlicensed money lending. It benefits legal professionals by refining strategies to address technicalities and strengthen client representation. It is in the news for its emphasis on trial-based evidence over dismissal.

Case Details:

The complainant, Anupama Singh, alleged the accused issued a cheque as repayment for a loan.

The accused, Prakash Chandra Gupta, denied the claim, arguing the complainant was engaged in illegal, unlicensed money lending.

The accused pointed out that without a proper license, the lending business violated the Punjab Registration of Money Lender’s Act, 1938.

He argued the cheque was not for a legally valid debt, making the complaint under Section 138 invalid.

The court dismissed the discharge application, stating these claims require evidence and will be decided during the trial.

How I Can Assist: As a skilled lawyer, I specialize in resolving cheque-related disputes, particularly those involving questions of lending legality. I help clients by building strong arguments, ensuring compliance with regulations, and providing effective representation to protect their interests.

#ChequeBounceCase
#LegalInsights
#NIAct138
#IllegalLending
#FinancialDisputes
#TrialAndEvidence
#LegalCompliance
#MoneyLendingLaws
#CourtroomStrategies
#LegalSupport

Key Points from the Update: Brokerage is capped a

Key Points from the Update:

Brokerage is capped at 1% of the property value for each party.

Fees must be clearly disclosed in agreements.

Dual commissions (from both buyer and seller) are prohibited.

Proper documentation is mandatory to avoid misunderstandings.

Penalties are introduced for violations.

How I Can Help:
As a lawyer, I can guide you through these regulations, ensure fair dealings, and protect your interests in property transactions. Reach out for expert advice!

#MahaRERA #MaharashtraRealEstate #RealEstateRegulations #BrokerageFees #PropertyTransactions #HomeBuyers #FairRealEstate #MaharashtraLaw #TransparencyInRealEstate #LegalSupport #ConsumerRights #RealEstateGuidelines #PropertyLaw #MumbaiRealEstate #MaharashtraProperty

We wish you a very Happy Guru Nanak Jayanti ✨

We wish you a very Happy Guru Nanak Jayanti ✨

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP RERA) has introduced a model Offer of Possession letter format to protect homebuyers. Promoters must now issue possession letters in this uniform format and only after receiving the Occupation or Completion Certificate, aiming to reduce arbitrary practices. The letter must exclude conditions not agreed upon in the original sale agreement, ensuring transparency. The initiative mandates notifications through email, postal services, and SMS, alongside display at project sites. Chairman Sanjay Bhoosreddy emphasized this measure will build trust and prevent misuse in possession procedures.

#UPRERA
#RealEstateReforms
#HomebuyerProtection
#PossessionLetter
#TransparentRealEstate
#PropertyRights
#HomeOwnership
#Homebuying
#RealEstateIndia
#TrustInRealEstate
#Homebuyers

The Supreme Court's recent ruling, focusing on the

The Supreme Court's recent ruling, focusing on the case Dolly Rani v. Manish Kumar Chanchal, stressed that Hindu marriages must comply with the rituals outlined in the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 to be considered legally valid. The Court invalidated a marriage that lacked these traditional ceremonies, emphasizing that rituals like the saptapadi (seven steps) or kanyadaan (giving away of the bride) are not merely symbolic but essential for legal recognition. This decision could bring changes in family law, reinforcing the importance of traditional customs in legal validation, ensuring that Hindu marriages honor both cultural and statutory requirements.

#SupremeCourtIndia
#HinduMarriageAct
#LegalValidity
#MarriageRituals
#TraditionalRites
#IndianFamilyLaw
#LandmarkJudgment
#MarriageLawIndia
#CulturalHeritage
#LegalUpdates

Justice Sanjiv Khanna was appointed as the 51st Ch

Justice Sanjiv Khanna was appointed as the 51st Chief Justice of India, taking office on November 11, 2024. Known for a record of landmark rulings, he succeeded his predecessor to lead the judiciary at a critical moment. His notable decisions include upholding the abrogation of Article 370, which revoked Jammu and Kashmir’s special status, and declaring electoral bonds unconstitutional, highlighting the need for transparency in political funding. Justice Khanna’s leadership is expected to bring a focus on judicial transparency, accountability, and reform. His expertise aligns well with current national challenges facing the judiciary.
#JusticeSanjivKhanna #ChiefJusticeOfIndia
#IndianJudiciary
#LandmarkJudgments #TransparencyInJustice
#JudicialReform #CJIAppointment
#Article370
#ElectoralReform #SupremeCourtIndia

The Supreme Court ruled that an outgoing partner i

The Supreme Court ruled that an outgoing partner is entitled to a share of profits derived from their stake in a partnership’s assets until final settlement. In a dispute involving Crystal Transport Service, where a partner alleged fund misuse, the court upheld the right of the outgoing partner to receive profits if the firm’s assets continue to generate income post-dissolution. The court referenced Section 37 of the Partnership Act, allowing the outgoing partner to claim a proportionate share. The case emphasizes partners’ rights to fair profit distribution following dissolution.

The Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRER

The Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA) recently directed four real estate developers to complete and hand over pending flats to buyers within 90 days. The order addresses complaints from buyers who have faced long delays in receiving their homes. This HRERA mandate seeks to enforce timely project completion, providing relief to buyers who have experienced significant delays. The decision underscores HRERA’s commitment to holding developers accountable and ensuring compliance with the RERA Act, which mandates transparency, adherence to project timelines, and consumer protection in real estate.
#HRERA #RealEstate #Haryana #RERAAct #Homebuyers #Accountability #ConsumerProtection #RealEstateNews

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP RERA) issued a public notice requiring builders to attend scheduled online hearings for 28 unresolved complaints. Builders from various districts, including companies like Shine City Infraprojects and Ganpati Builders, have repeatedly missed prior hearings. UP RERA has warned that if builders fail to participate even after this notice, decisions will be made unilaterally to address the complaints, potentially favoring the complainants. Links for virtual attendance will be sent two days before each hearing. This measure emphasizes UP RERA’s commitment to holding builders accountable under the RERA Act.

#UPRERA #RealEstateRegulation #BuildersAccountability #OnlineHearings #RERANotice #RealEstateComplaints #HomebuyersRights #RERAACT

In a case involving Aligarh Muslim University (AMU

In a case involving Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), the Supreme Court clarified criteria under Article 30(1) of the Indian Constitution for educational institutions to claim minority status. The court emphasized that both the establishment and administration of the institution by a minority community must be evident. Merely establishing an institution is insufficient for minority designation if the community relinquishes administrative control. Additionally, it’s unnecessary for a religious or linguistic community to display religious symbols. The judgment aims to preserve the autonomy of genuine minority institutions without diluting Article 30’s protections.
#amu #aligarhmuslimuniversity #aligs #aligarian #amuminoritystatus #amualigarh #supremecourt #supremecourtofindia #breakingnews #breakingnewsindia

Voyeurism is secretly watching or recording someon

Voyeurism is secretly watching or recording someone’s private moments, often for sexual pleasure.

Case Summary: Kerala High Court on Voyeurism (Section 354C IPC)

In Kerala High Court, Justice A. Badharudeen presiding, the court ruled on a case concerning the interpretation of voyeurism under Section 354C of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The accused petitioned against voyeurism charges, contending that taking photographs of a woman in public does not constitute voyeurism. Justice Badharudeen partially allowed the petition, stating that capturing images of a woman in public where there is no expectation of privacy does not violate Section 354C, which applies only when intimate body parts are exposed. Thus, the voyeurism charge against the accused was quashed.

#KeralaHighCourt #Voyeurism #Section354C #IndianPenalCode #PrivacyRights #PublicPhotography #LegalUpdate #JusticeBadharudeen #WomenRights #IndianLaw

Case Summary: Swiggy Overcharging Complaint (Ranga

Case Summary: Swiggy Overcharging Complaint (Ranga Reddy Consumer Disputes Commission)

In a recent ruling, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Ranga Reddy, Hyderabad, found Swiggy guilty of inflating delivery distances and overcharging a customer who held a Swiggy One membership. The customer claimed unfair practices and excessive charges, which the commission deemed a violation of consumer rights. The ruling mandates Swiggy to correct its practices, ensure transparent billing, and adhere to accurate distance calculations. This decision emphasizes consumer rights and holds companies accountable, likely leading to improved transparency in delivery services, fostering trust, and setting a precedent for ethical business conduct in the digital marketplace.

#ConsumerRights #FairBilling #SwiggyCase #DigitalTransparency #EthicalBusiness #CustomerProtection #FairDeliveryCharges #OnlineMarketplace #JusticeServed

The Supreme Court recently ruled that government e

The Supreme Court recently ruled that government entities must follow the same rules as private companies when trying to delay payment on arbitration awards. Previously, a High Court had allowed a government entity to avoid making an extra deposit, assuming it wasn’t a flight risk. However, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, decided that government bodies should not get special treatment in such cases. This ruling emphasizes fairness in arbitration, meaning all parties must meet the same requirements to delay payments, regardless of their government or private status.

#arbitration #arbitrationindia #governmentagencies #supremecourtofindia #highcourtdelhi #tishazaricourt

Happy Bhai Dooj! May the bond between you and your

Happy Bhai Dooj! May the bond between you and your siblings grow stronger with each passing year. Wishing you love, happiness, and success in all that you do. Enjoy this special day filled with blessings and joy!

We wish you a very Happy Govardhan Puja ✨

We wish you a very Happy Govardhan Puja ✨

Happy Diwali! May this festival of lights fill you

Happy Diwali! May this festival of lights fill your life with joy, prosperity, and peace. Wishing you and your loved ones a bright and joyful Diwali!

Wishing you a joyous Choti Diwali filled with warm

Wishing you a joyous Choti Diwali filled with warmth, happiness, and the glow of countless diyas! May this festival bring light to your life and fill your days with peace and prosperity. Happy Choti Diwali!

“Abhijeet Gupta and Associates wishes you a pros

“Abhijeet Gupta and Associates wishes you a prosperous Dhanteras! May this festival bring wealth, health, and happiness to you and your family. Happy Dhanteras filled with blessings!”

The Supreme Court in Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. A.S. Ra

The Supreme Court in Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. A.S. Raghavendra clarified that A.S. Raghavendra did not qualify as a “workman” under the Industrial Disputes Act (ID Act) Section 2(s) due to his supervisory and managerial role. Employed as a senior manager overseeing account managers, his job included administrative duties and entitlements like car allowances, indicating a managerial role. Despite his claim of being forced to resign, the Court found his resignation voluntary, dismissing grievances about appraisal as insufficient for claiming coercion. This decision reinforces that managerial duties, even without powers to hire or fire, fall outside the “workman” category.
#laboulaw #workmanship #workersofindia #labourcourt #supremecourt #supremecourtofindia #supremecourtjudgement

Load More Follow on Instagram